coraa: (book wyrm)
[personal profile] coraa
Has anyone ever seen a situation where an author defended themselves in the face of a less-than-positive review, where it came out with the author looking better than if they'd refrained from involving themselves?

I've seen authors involve themselves in positive discussions without problem. And I've seen authors say neutral things like 'Thank you for your review' in response to negative responses without problem. But I can't think of a single example of a time when an author has attempted to defend themselves from, or refute, a negative review, where the author has not come out looking measurably worse.

Date: 2009-12-17 02:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paperclippy.livejournal.com
Even worse is when authors jump in to defend their fellow authors against negative reviews.

Date: 2009-12-17 03:43 pm (UTC)

Date: 2009-12-17 07:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coraa.livejournal.com
Oh my goodness, yes. It looks/feels to me like throwing a poor reviewer to the wolves. But worse than that, it looks like the author thinks that they and the other authors are on the same "side," with readers being the "opposition," and that makes me cringe. I am a book-buying individual! I am not the enemy!

Profile

coraa: (Default)
coraa

April 2013

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829 30    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 10:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios